COUNTERPARTY FILE · last re-checked 2026-09
Wells Fargo Corporate & Investment Banking FX — institutional liquidity provider
This record highlights potential gaps in transparency regarding FX platform details and self-reported metrics.
Licence, read literally
| Regulator | Licence number | Jurisdiction | Tier | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCA | 186745 | United Kingdom | tier-1 | open source ↗ |
| SEC/FINRA (broker-dealer) | 8-65876 | United States | tier-1 | open source ↗ |
Tier classification follows the same scale as the retail register: tier-2 means real supervision and client-money segregation, without an investor compensation scheme — never misread it as tier-1 protection.
Residuals a counterparty carries
Unpublished FX platform details
The FX platform name and venue/connectivity list are not published on the bank's CIB pages.
Source: firm disclosures page
Self-measured client growth
'FX client base almost doubled since 2021' is a self-measured claim by the bank.
Source: firm disclosures page
The claims ledger
Claims specific enough to be falsified — and the ones that remain the venue's own measurement.
Testable claims
- Own CIB page states the Foreign Exchange team was recognized as the 2025 Best Bank in North America by Euromoney (wellsfargo.com/cib)
- 'Since 2021, our FX client base has almost doubled, and we have made substantial investments in both top-tier talent and advanced technology' (wellsfargo.com/cib)
- Own about page: 'serving customers… since our founding by Henry Wells and William Fargo in 1852' (wellsfargo.com/about)
Claims we cannot verify from outside
- 'Best Bank in North America 2025' is a Euromoney award relayed on the bank's own page — third-party award, not a measured metric
- FX client base 'almost doubled since 2021' — self-measured
Perimeter and coverage
| Asset classes | Venues | Connectivity | Clients accepted | Explicitly refused |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FX | Corporates, Institutions |
A firm that publishes its own negative space — who it refuses, where it is not licensed — is materially easier to diligence than one that doesn't. The refusal list is treated here as disclosure, not as a defect.