Skip to main content
pipvet.comBroker Status Register
Report a broker
Independent

This register is not a regulator. Every status links to the regulator's own notice or register entry.

341 firms on file · 202 identified entity records 73 carry a published regulator notice

COUNTERPARTY FILE · last re-checked 2026-09

LMAX Digital — institutional liquidity provider

The record indicates potential information gaps regarding operational transparency and client data.

LMAX Digital Broker Limited · Gibraltar

evidence score
55/100

Licence, read literally

RegulatorLicence numberJurisdictionTierSource
GFSCFSC1342BGibraltarT2open source
Tier classification follows the same scale as the retail register: tier-2 means real supervision and client-money segregation, without an investor compensation scheme — never misread it as tier-1 protection.

Residuals a counterparty carries

2

  1. R01

    Unpublished client refusal data

    LMAX Digital has not published any information regarding client refusals.

    Source: firm disclosures page

  2. R02

    No published data centres

    No named data centres are published on LMAX Digital's homepage.

    Source: firm disclosures page

The claims ledger

Claims specific enough to be falsified — and the ones that remain the venue's own measurement.

Testable claims

  • LMAX Digital is a trading name of LMAX Digital Broker Limited, authorised and regulated by the Gibraltar Financial Services Commission, licence FSC1342B (Gibraltar company 117528) — stated on lmaxdigital.com
  • Regulated by the GFSC as a DLT provider for execution and custody services
  • Custody uses a tiered offline wallet system based on cold wallets and vault storage

Claims we cannot verify from outside

  • 'The institutional spot cryptocurrency exchange' positioning and volume/liquidity claims are the firm's own marketing

Perimeter and coverage

Asset classes
Spot cryptocurrencies
Venues
Connectivity
Clients accepted
Institutional cryptocurrency market participants
Explicitly refused
A firm that publishes its own negative space — who it refuses, where it is not licensed — is materially easier to diligence than one that doesn't. The refusal list is treated here as disclosure, not as a defect.