Skip to main content
pipvet.comBroker Status Register
Report a broker
Independent

This register is not a regulator. Every status links to the regulator's own notice or register entry.

341 firms on file · 202 identified entity records 73 carry a published regulator notice

COUNTERPARTY FILE · last re-checked 2026-09

Drovix — institutional liquidity provider

Drovix (MU) Ltd · not examined

evidence score
78/100

Licence, read literally

RegulatorLicence numberJurisdictionTierSource
Financial Services Commission (Mauritius)not published · authorised · checked 2026-09MUT3open source
Tier classification follows the same scale as the retail register: tier-2 means real supervision and client-money segregation, without an investor compensation scheme — never misread it as tier-1 protection.

Residuals a counterparty carries

1

  1. R01

    Self-measured performance

    Latency (<1ms internal target), LP count (15+) and fill ratios are the venue's own measurements until a counterparty reproduces them in UAT. The TCA export architecture makes them auditable for an actual client — a prospective one should insist on it.

    Source: drovix.com/technology — targets stated as 'targets, not guarantees'

The claims ledger

Claims specific enough to be falsified — and the ones that remain the venue's own measurement.

Testable claims

  • Internal execution target <1ms on the C++/Aeron stack, with the measurement boundary disclosed (internal only; client RTT network-dependent)
  • Active-active failover across four Equinix venues with redundant cross-connects
  • 99.9% uptime SLA target, published as a target rather than a guarantee
  • Per-fill TCA export (spread captured, slippage vs mid, fill ratio, time-to-fill) for the counterparty's own analytics

Claims we cannot verify from outside

  • LP count (15+) and fill ratios are the venue's own measurement
  • Internalisation quality ('zero market impact' routing) cannot be observed from outside the portal

Perimeter and coverage

Asset classes
not examined
Venues
not examined
Connectivity
not examined
Clients accepted
not examined
Explicitly refused
not examined
A firm that publishes its own negative space — who it refuses, where it is not licensed — is materially easier to diligence than one that doesn't. The refusal list is treated here as disclosure, not as a defect.

The full due-diligence file

Read the full counterparty file

Source: drovix.com